4.2 Review

A scoping review of psychosocial interventions to reduce internalised shame

Journal

PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 131-145

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2082340

Keywords

internalised shame; psychosocial interventions; treatment efficacy; scoping review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Internalised shame has been linked to poor treatment outcomes and premature therapy termination. A scoping review of therapist-delivered psychosocial interventions found that psychoeducation, experiential exercises, and techniques to increase social support and emotional expression may be effective in reducing internalised shame.
Objective: Internalised shame has been linked to psychopathology and consistently identified as a predictor of poor treatment outcomes and premature therapy termination. We conducted a scoping review of therapist-delivered psychosocial interventions to reduce internalised shame to learn how to improve outcomes for individuals experiencing shame. Method: Six bibliographical databases were searched for studies measuring internalised shame pre- and post-treatment. We screened 6846 abstracts; 42 full-text manuscripts were retrieved, with 16 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 studies examined between- and within-subject effects, and 6 studies exclusively examined within-subject effects. Results: Twelve of the sixteen included studies reported small to moderate within-group reductions in internalised shame. Between group analyses showed that shame interventions may be more effective than no treatment or treatment as usual, but not more effective than an active comparator. Conclusion: Successful treatments often involved psychoeducation, experiential exercises, and techniques to increase social support and emotional expression; however, study quality was weak to moderate and the importance of each of these techniques for reducing internalised shame was not determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available