4.7 Article

Measuring food systems sustainability in heterogenous countries: The Brazilian multidimensional index updated version applicability

Journal

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 91-107

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2376

Keywords

economic; environmental; food system; nutritional; social; sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a multidimensional index for sustainable food systems (MISFS) to measure food system sustainability and demonstrates its applicability in the Brazilian context. The findings show an inverse relationship between economic and environmental performance, while economic performance is positively related to social and nutritional scores. Cluster analysis reveals significant differences in the sustainability profiles of food systems across Brazilian states.
Countries with large territories marked by heterogeneity lack tools to monitor their distinct food systems sustainability. The multidimensional index for sustainable food systems (MISFS) was designed to measure food system sustainability locally, using the Brazilian territory. The aim was two-fold: to present the MISFS updating process (MISFS-R), and to show the applicability of MISFS-R to uncover local geopolitical priorities. Methods: Based on a systematized review and sensitivity analysis, 46 indicators were selected to compose the MISFS-R social, nutritional, environmental, and economic dimensions. Official Brazilian datasets allowed the MISFS-R scoring for 26 Brazilian states and capitals. Correlations between MISFS-R dimensions were analyzed by Spearman's coefficient. A cluster analysis was used to check for Brazilian states similarities and priorities. Findings: Economic and environmental performance were inversely related, while economic performance was directly related to social and nutritional scores. Four clusters were formed with marked differences in their food systems sustainability profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available