4.2 Article

Measuring Women's Empowerment: Gender and Time-use Agency in Benin, Malawi and Nigeria

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 1010-1034

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dech.12725

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IFAD [2000002043]
  2. GIZ [81239814]
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-008977]
  4. CGIAR Research Programme on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH)
  5. Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the concept of time-use agency and highlights its importance in empowering both men and women. The study finds that women's capacity to exercise time-use agency is influenced by gender power dynamics and other barriers, which are reciprocally related to local gender norms.
Time use, or how women and men allocate their time, is an important element of empowerment processes. To extend this area of study, this article proposes and explores the concept of time-use agency, which shifts the focus from the amount of time individuals spend on activities to the strategic choices they make about how to allocate their time. It draws on 92 semi-structured interviews from three qualitative studies in Benin, Malawi and Nigeria to explore and compare the salience of time-use agency as a component of empowerment. The article finds that time-use agency is salient among women and men and dictates how they can make and act upon strategic decisions related to how they allocate their time. It also finds that time-use agency is tied to other dimensions of agency beyond decision making and ways of exerting influence in the household. Its findings highlight that women's capacity to exercise time-use agency is conditional on gendered power dynamics and other barriers within households, which together are reciprocally related to local gender norms that dictate how women should spend their time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available