4.2 Review

Lean and corporate social responsibility: a systematic literature review

Journal

TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Volume 34, Issue 5-6, Pages 637-671

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2090920

Keywords

Lean production; corporate social responsibility; environmental management; health and safety; ethical management; literature review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the current literature on lean production and CSR and proposes new research areas. It reveals a high degree of compatibility between lean and CSR in terms of environmental and safety dimensions, but there is a lack of research on other CSR dimensions, lean performance, stakeholders, and the overall impact of lean on CSR.
Companies have been adopting corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices to improve their competitiveness and performance. Lean production has been found to be able to boost green and other dimensions of CSR such as health and safety and social responsibility, and there is ever-growing research interest in lean and CSR. The primary purpose of this study is to analyze the current literature related to lean production and CSR, and to propose new avenues of research in this area. Thus, the study employed a systematic literature review approach. Hundred and twenty-one articles were selected, reviewed, and synthesized. The search included all years included in the databases until 2020. It was found that research has generally investigated lean and the environmental dimension of CSR, but only a limited amount of research has examined lean in relation to other CSR dimensions or directly to CSR as a whole. Research has particularly lacked in relation to lean performance, stakeholders, and the effects of lean on CSR at a more complex level. The findings reveal a relatively high degree of compatibility between lean, its tools and methods, and CSR, particularly the environmental and safety dimensions of CSR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available