4.2 Article

Resilience of the Silo Organizational Structure in the European Commission

Journal

JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 545-562

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13388

Keywords

organizational reforms; resilience; silo structure; circular economy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the impact of President Juncker's organizational reforms on the political role of the Commission, coordination among Directorates General, and the policy governance of the circular economy. The reforms centralized power and increased monitoring of DGs' work, strengthening the Commission's leadership. However, they also undermined the entrepreneurial role of DGs and services in policy governance and innovation. DGs demonstrated resistance and resilience to these top-down reforms, which can be attributed to their administrative capacity, practices, culture, and inter-DG competition.
This article investigates whether the organizational reforms that President Jean-Claude Juncker introduced strengthened the Commission's political role, enhanced co-ordination among Directorates General and affected the policy governance with respect to the circular economy. Drawing on organizational theory, the article demonstrates how Juncker's reforms empowered the Commission's leadership by centralization of powers and close monitoring of DGs' work. The inter-institutional interactions among the DGs formally increased, especially with respect to information clarification and the allocation of competences and resources. However, the top-down reforms undermined the DGs' and the services' entrepreneurial role in policy governance and innovation. In response, the individual DGs demonstrated resistance and resilience to these reforms. The article attributes this resistance and resilience to the DG's distinctive administrative capacity, practices, culture and the 'logic of portfolio', that reinvigorated the silo structure in the Commission and intensified inter-DG competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available