4.3 Article

Viewpoint: Why Do Planners Overlook Manufactured Housing and Resident-Owned Communities as Sources of Affordable Housing and Climate Transformation?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 72-79

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2022.2038238

Keywords

climate change; displacement; housing cooperatives; manufactured housing; shared equity housing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article addresses common biases against manufactured housing communities (MHCs) and resident-owned communities (ROCs), highlighting the importance of giving more attention to ROCs as they provide low-income individuals with improved housing security in the face of financial and environmental vulnerabilities.
More Americans live in manufactured housing than in public and federally subsidized rental housing combined. Of the nearly 40,000 U.S. manufactured housing communities (MHCs), more than 1,000 are resident-owned communities (ROCs), a form of cooperative ownership. Yet planning research continues to neglect MHCs and ROCs, raising questions of classism and cultural bias. We address five common biases against MHCs and argue ROCs in particular deserve greater attention because they enable low-income people to improve their housing security in the face of financial and environmental vulnerabilities. Lessons from these efforts can help other alternative and collective housing providers do the same.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available