4.2 Article

Feeding hungry students: College students' experiences using food pantries and successful strategies for implementing on-campus food assistance programs

Journal

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2098031

Keywords

College students; food assistance; food insecurity; food access; eating behaviors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to examine the components of successful food assistance programs for college students. Through focus groups and key informant interviews, six strategies of effective food assistance programs were identified, while themes of financial stressors, eating strategies, struggling to feed dependents, etc., were discovered among college students.
Objective To examine the components of successful food assistance programs for college students. Participants Focus groups conducted during the fall 2019 semester included undergraduate students who accessed a food assistance program on campus (n = 26). Key informant interviews were conducted with professionals working with campus-based food assistance programs (n = 5). Methods Student insight regarding experiences on campus-based food assistance programs was gathered. Key informant interviews were conducted to gain an understanding of strategies put in place to alleviate food insecurity among college students. Results Emerging focus group themes included financial stressors, eating strategies, struggling to feed dependents, utilization of university-based food assistance programs, and SNAP enrollment. Key informant interviews revealed six strategies of effective food assistance programs: increasing access, securing funding, procurement/distribution of healthy foods, partnerships, outreach, and decreasing stigmatization. Conclusions A mission driven approach has the potential to meet the complex needs of food insecure college students.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available