4.7 Article

Corporate social responsibility: Does it really matter in the luxury context?

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2341

Keywords

business model; corporate social responsibility; customer sensitivity; financial performance; luxury; Moncler; sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines corporate social responsibility in the luxury sector. By conducting an in-depth longitudinal and qualitative analysis of a luxury company, the results reveal that CSR does not affect financial performance despite a negative event. Ultimately, the study proposes a matrix to explain the various influences on a luxury company's business model and financial performance.
The impact of CSR in the luxury sector has been less investigated than in the non-luxury context, and the findings in the luxury context are not unidirectional. In recent years, researchers have begun exploring the link between CSR and luxury. These efforts have attempted to overcome the gap between theory and practice while also acknowledging that luxury and CSR can be considered conflicting concepts. This mixed picture underscores the need for further investigations. The current study aims to illuminate CSR in the luxury context by examining business model development and financial performance. In particular, we conducted an in-depth longitudinal and qualitative analysis of a leading luxury company that had experienced an event that had negatively impacted CSR. Specifically, this event affected the supply chain, and the public indignation that ensued impacted the firm's financial performance. Our results revealed that in the case of a luxury organisation, CSR does not affect financial performance despite a negative event. Ultimately, the study offers insights into CSR in the luxury context by proposing a matrix to explain the various influences on a company's business model and financial performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available