4.6 Article

Exploring the relative importance of epistemic value, value for money and perceived safety in visitors' evaluation of a destination

Journal

CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2105197

Keywords

Epistemic value; value for money; perceived safety; visitor satisfaction; Tourism destination; covid-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the relative importance of epistemic value, value for money, and perceived safety in visitors' evaluation of a foreign destination. The findings suggest that these three factors significantly influence overall satisfaction, which further affects visitors' willingness to recommend the destination. Additionally, perceived safety and epistemic value also directly impact the willingness to recommend. The study highlights the importance of emphasizing epistemic value, overall satisfaction, and safety in marketing communications to attract international visitors.
This study explores the relative importance of epistemic value, value for money and perceived safety in visitors' evaluation of a foreign destination. Based on a sample of 248 international tourists who visited Zanzibar between July 2021 and January 2022, the study shows that the three factors are significantly associated with overall satisfaction, subsequently affecting the visitor's willingness to recommend the destination. However, perceived safety and epistemic value also directly affect the willingness to recommend. Regarding importance, epistemic value is the most important antecedent of the willingness to recommend, while the value for money is the least important. The results imply that as destinations strive to attract international visitors following the pandemic, their marketing communications should emphasize epistemic value, overall satisfaction, and safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available