4.5 Article

Students' growth mindset: Relation to teacher beliefs, teaching practices, and school climate

Journal

LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101616

Keywords

Implicit theories; Growth mindset; Teacher beliefs; Instructional practices; School culture

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [308351, 345117, 336138]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [336138] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that students were more likely to have a growth mindset in classrooms where teachers used guided inquiry and in schools that emphasized students' social-emotional development. However, students were more likely to have a fixed mindset when teachers assigned different tasks to different students based on ability.
To effectively cultivate students' growth mindset, it is important to identify contextual factors that may communicate mindset messages to students. The present study examined the association of students' growth mindset with various dimensions of teacher beliefs (mindset, self-efficacy), teaching practices (guided inquiry, group work, task differentiation, in-class ability grouping, mastery and normative evaluations), and school climate (holistic development, in-school ability grouping). Participants were 2200 ten-year-old students, 358 teachers, and 65 principals from Finnish elementary schools that participated in the OECD Survey on Social and Emotional Skills. Multilevel analyses show that students endorsed more of a growth mindset in classrooms where teachers used guided inquiry and in schools that emphasized students' social-emotional development. In contrast, students endorsed more of a fixed mindset when teachers assigned different tasks to different students based on ability. Implications for how to combine teaching practices to support students' growth mindset are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available