4.5 Article

Assessment of the application of two amendments (lime and biochar) on the acidification and bioavailability of Ni in a Ni-contaminated agricultural soils of northern Colombia

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10221

Keywords

Potential toxic metals; Acidic soils; Soil remediation; Amendment; Plant growth

Funding

  1. Universidad de Medellin [321316/427405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the application of biochar can significantly reduce soil acidity, improve soil physicochemical properties, and reduce the bioavailability of nickel. Compared to lime, biochar has a more pronounced effect in reducing human health risks, even under conditions of soil re-acidification. Therefore, biochar is more suitable for improving acidic soils and remedying nickel-contaminated agricultural soils.
Soil acidification and increased bioavailability of Ni are problems that affect agricultural soils. This study aims to compare the effects of both lime and biochar from corn stover in soil acidity correction, improving soil physi-cochemical properties and soil re-acidification resistance. As well as assesseing the impacts on human health risk caused by bioavailability of nickel. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted for 30 days to determine the effect of biochar and lime on soil physicochemical properties and nickel bioavailability. Afterwards, a laboratory test was carried out to determine the repercussions of both amendments on soil resistance to re-acidification and re-mobilization of nickel. Human health risk was determined using nickle bioavailable concentration. Overall, the results of this study showed that biochar application significantly reduced soil acidity from 8.2 - 0.8 meq 100 g-1 to 1.9 - 0.3 meq 100 g-1, this reduction markedly influenced the bioavailability of nickel, which decreased significantly. Moreover, soil physicochemical properties and soil resistance to acidification were improved. Furthermore, biochar significantly reduced human health risk compared to lime application, even under a re -acidification scenario. It was possible to verify that Ni immobilization in the soil was increased when biochar was used. Soil Ni immobilization is associated with co-precipitation and chemisorption. Hence, it was demon-strated that biochar is more effective than lime in reducing soil acidity and remedying nickel-contaminated agricultural soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available