Redundancy and Reducibility in the Formats of Spatial Representations

Mental representations are the essence of cognition. Yet to understand how the mind works, one must understand not just the content of mental representations (i.e., what information is stored) but also the format of those representations (i.e., how that information is stored). But what does it mean for representations to be formatted? How many formats are there? Is it possible that the mind represents some pieces of information in multiple formats at once? To address these questions, I discuss a case study of representational format: the representation of spatial location. I review work (a) across species and across development, (b) across spatial scales, and (c) across levels of analysis (e.g., high-level cognitive format vs. low-level neural format). Along the way, I discuss the possibility that the same information may be organized in multiple formats simultaneously (e.g., that locations may be represented in both Cartesian and polar coordinates). Ultimately, I argue that seemingly redundant formats may support the flexible spatial behavior observed in humans and that researchers should approach the study of all mental representations with this possibility in mind.

Automated summary

Mental representations are crucial for cognition and understanding how the mind works requires studying both the content and format of these representations. Investigating the format of spatial location representation can provide insights into the redundancy and flexibility across different formats.