4.4 Article

Directed Forgetting in Working Memory

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
Volume 151, Issue 12, Pages 2990-3008

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xge0001256

Keywords

directed forgetting; working memory; removal

Funding

  1. Swiss Confederation, Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships for Foreign Scholars and Artists
  2. German Academic Exchange Service arship
  3. German Research Foundation [RA1934/5-1]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [100014_179002]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [100014_179002] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intent to remember or forget information has a significant impact on working memory, leading to different effects on memory retention and recognition.
How does the intent to remember or forget information affect working memory (WM)? To explore this question, in four experiments, we gauged the availability of the to-be-forgotten information directly. Participants remembered six words presented sequentially in separate frames. After each word offset, the frame turned either blue or orange, indicating a to-be-remembered or to-be-forgotten word, respectively. In all experiments, consistently poor recognition performance for to-be-forgotten words and facilitation of to-be-remembered words demonstrated that intent has a strong impact on WM. These directed-forgetting effects are remarkably robust: They can be observed when testing the to-be-forgotten words up to four times (Experiment 1, n = 341), for both item and binding memory (Experiment 3, n = 124), and even when information has to be maintained in WM up to 5 s until the memory cue is presented (Experiment 2 + 4, n = 302 + 321). Our study establishes a new method to jointly study the effects of intent on WM content for both relevant and irrelevant information and provides evidence for directed forgetting in WM. Our research suggests that a combination of two processes causes directed forgetting in WM: One process reduces memory strength of earlier memory representations as a function of subsequently encoded events. Another process rapidly encodes or boosts memory strength only when the person intends to remember that information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available