4.4 Article

Hidden Gems: Do market participants respond to performance expectations revealed in compensation disclosures?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101519

Keywords

Compensation disclosure; Voluntary disclosure; Market efficiency; Return predictability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We find that a new compensation disclosure item reveals unique information on future firm performance. Firms with the highest expected grant payout outperform in various performance metrics, while those with the lowest payout underperform. This information is not captured by other channels, and investors underreact to it. A portfolio strategy based on this information generates significantly positive abnormal returns.
We find that a new compensation disclosure item on expected payouts from performancebased stock grants reveals unique information regarding future firm performance. Extracting inferred performance expectations from the disclosures, we find that firms disclosing the highest expected grant payout significantly outperform in ROA, Q, sales growth, and profit margin over the next two years, while those disclosing the lowest expected payout underperform. The embedded information is not captured by other information channels, such as managerial earnings guidance, 10-K sentiment, insider selling activities, unexplained CEO pay, and analyst forecasts. Investors and analysts do not fully incorporate the information and are later surprised around earnings announcement days. A portfolio that buys firms with the highest performance expectation and shorts firms with the lowest expectation earns significantly positive abnormal returns. Our findings suggest that the enhanced compensation disclosure contains valuable information, but investors underreact to information that is difficult to collect and process.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available