4.8 Article

It Takes Two to Tango: Analyzing the Relationship between Technological and Administrative Process Innovations in Industry 4.0

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121675

Keywords

Industry 4; 0; Smart manufacturing; Process innovation; Technological innovation; Administrative innovation; Management innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Industry 4.0 brings fundamental changes to company processes, where both technological and administrative process innovations are important and interact with each other in complex ways. This study highlights the significance of work design, people management, and strategy for Industry 4.0 initiatives.
Industry 4.0 brings about fundamental changes in company processes. New digital technologies as well as organizational and administrative processes need to be addressed. However, existing research mainly emphasizes the technological aspects of Industry 4.0, paying little attention to the organizational perspective. Conducting a qualitative meta-analysis, this study examines the interplay between technological process innovations and administrative process innovations emergent in Industry 4.0. The results show that technological and administrative process innovations occur both sequentially and simultaneously and complement each other in the context of Industry 4.0. Consequently, the interplay between the two types of innovations is complex in Industry 4.0. Additionally, this study reveals that work design, people management, and strategy are crucial for Industry 4.0 initiatives. The study sheds light on the ways in which firms adopt technological and administrative process innovations in the pursuit of Industry 4.0. Moreover, the findings highlight the importance of considering Industry 4.0 not merely from a technological perspective and provide insights on the various factors that should be considered concerning Industry 4.0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available