4.4 Article

Quantifying and addressing the impact of measurement error in network models

Journal

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104163

Keywords

Measurement error; Replicability; Single -item indicators; Multiple -item indicators; Latent network modeling

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health Career Development
  2. NWO Veni [1K23MH113805-01A1]
  3. National Institutes of Health [016-195-261]
  4. [K76AG064390]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Network psychometric models, often estimated using single indicators, fail to consider measurement error. This study investigates the impact of measurement error on cross-sectional network models. Results from simulation and empirical data demonstrate that measurement error impairs the reliability and performance of network models, especially when using single indicators. Increasing sample size and utilizing multiple indicators improve the reliability and performance of network models.
Network psychometric models are often estimated using a single indicator for each node in the network, thus failing to consider potential measurement error. In this study, we investigate the impact of measurement error on cross-sectional network models. First, we conduct a simulation study to evaluate the performance of models based on single indicators as well as models that utilize information from multiple indicators per node, including average scores, factor scores, and latent variables. Our results demonstrate that measurement error impairs the reliability and performance of network models, especially when using single indicators. The reliability and performance of network models improves substantially with increasing sample size and when using methods that combine information from multiple indicators per node. Second, we use empirical data from the STAR*D trial (n = 3,731) to further evaluate the impact of measurement error. In the STAR*D trial, depression symptoms were assessed via three questionnaires, providing multiple indicators per symptom. Consistent with our simulation results, we find that when using sub-samples of this dataset, the discrepancy between the three single-indicator networks (one network per questionnaire) diminishes with increasing sample size. Together, our simulated and empirical findings provide evidence that measurement error can hinder network estimation when working with smaller samples and offers guidance on methods to mitigate measurement error.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available