4.7 Article

Optimising VRE capacity in Renewable Energy Zones

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106239

Keywords

Renewable Energy Zones; Renewable generation; Transmission investment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Australia experienced significant growth in variable renewable energy (VRE) investment commitments during 2016-2021. Inadequate network hosting capacity posed challenges for some projects. This article examines the development of Renewable Energy Zones (REZ) and explores various strategies for VRE development using optimization models.
Australia experienced significant growth in variable renewable energy (VRE) investment commitments during 2016-2021. A subset of projects experienced material entry frictions which stemmed from inadequate network hosting capacity. In this article we examine the development of Renewable Energy Zones (REZ) as a means by which to help guide forward market commitments and produce greater coordination between generation and transmission plant investments. Using an optimisation model comprising 1500 MW of transmission network infrastructure, we explore various definitions of a 'fully subscribed REZ' given portfolio benefits associated with complementary wind and solar resources in Southern Queensland. When minimising cost forms the objective function, full subscription is achieved by developing 2050 MW of VRE, comprising 1700 MW of wind and 350 MW of solar. When maximising output forms the objective function, similar to 3400 MW of wind and solar is developed in roughly equal proportions, accepting some curtailment is an economic result. And if maximising net cashflows forms the objective, VRE development is complicated by the dynamic nature of spot prices. Specifically, in the early stages of a REZ solar is preferred but as its market share rises and value of output falls, wind investments dominate holding technology costs constant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available