Journal
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 278-298Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00222437221110173
Keywords
rational inattention; consideration; consumer welfare; discrete-choice consumer demand
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The conventional discrete-choice model assumes consumers have full information, which contradicts the literature on incomplete information and the role of consumer attention. The author develops a novel empirical demand model based on consumers' rational inattention, which considers both utility factors and information evaluation costs. Through an empirical case study, the author demonstrates the importance of evaluation costs in measuring the value of new products.
The conventional discrete-choice model of demand assumes that consumers are fully informed about every available product alternative. This assumption is at odds with the large body of literature studying incomplete information and the role of the consumer's evoked set or consideration set. The author develops a novel empirical discrete-choice demand model derived from an underlying theory of consumers' rational inattention. The model distinguishes between factors that shift demand through the utility function, such as prices and product attributes, and factors that shift demand through the consumer's information evaluation costs. The author conducts an empirical case study of the laundry detergent category. Using a set of exclusion restrictions based on retail promotional instruments, specification tests select the rational inattention model over the conventional full-information discrete-choice model. Exploiting the launch of Tide Pods midway through the sample, the author demonstrates the role of evaluation costs for the measured value creation from a new product. A conventional discrete-choice model always assigns positive incremental consumer value from new products. However, the rational inattention model developed herein finds a decrease in overall consumer welfare from the new Tide Pods' entry, with the increased friction in information associated with the larger choice set offsetting the potential gains from higher match value.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available