4.8 Review

Atmospheric cloud modeling methods in computer graphics: A review, trends, taxonomy, and future directions

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.11.030

Keywords

Atmospheric cloud; Cloud modeling; Cloud shape; Driven methods; Computer graphics; Visualization

Funding

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an in-depth review of atmospheric cloud modeling methods, analyzing research trends, categorizing methods, and summarizing specific methods, providing a comprehensive understanding for researchers and practitioners.
The modeling of atmospheric clouds is one of the crucial elements in the natural phenomena visualization system. Over the years, a wide range of approaches has been proposed on this topic to deal with the challenging issues associated with visual realism and performance. However, the lack of recent review papers on the atmospheric cloud modeling methods available in computer graphics makes it difficult for researchers and practitioners to understand and choose the well-suited solutions for developing the atmospheric cloud visualization system. Hence, we conducted a comprehensive review to identify, analyze, classify, and summarize the existing atmospheric cloud modeling solutions. We selected 113 research studies from recognizable data sources and analyzed the research trends on this topic. We defined a taxonomy by categorizing the atmospheric cloud modeling methods based on the methods' similar characteristics and summarized each of the particular methods. Finally, we underlined several research issues and directions for potential future work. The review results provide an overview and general picture of the atmospheric cloud modeling methods that would be beneficial for researchers and practitioners.(c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available