4.7 Article

A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery

Journal

NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00641-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert C. Watzke MD Professorship
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, New York
  3. Helmholtz Imaging Platform (HIP), a platform of the Helmholtz Incubator on Information and Data Science
  4. Enid Linder Foundation
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  6. University of Bristol
  7. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany
  8. German Federal Ministry of Health within project Surgomics
  9. German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of Germany's Excellence Strategy [390696704, EXC2050/1]
  10. Royal College of Surgeons of England Chair in Trials in Surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of digital technology in surgical specialties is growing rapidly, but there is no consensus on the term 'digital surgery'. Surgeons and patients face unique technical, governance, and legal challenges in the application of digital health technologies, highlighting the importance of addressing ethical issues in digital surgery.
The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term 'digital surgery'. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law, litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available