4.4 Article

Examining the Effect of Natural Fractures on Stone Mine Pillar Strength Through Synthetic Rock Mass Approach

Journal

MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 1863-1871

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-022-00649-2

Keywords

Synthetic rock mass; Discrete fracture networks; Numerical modeling; Stone mine pillars; UDEC

Funding

  1. Alpha Foundation for the Improvement of Mine Safety and Health, Inc. (Alpha Foundation)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the novel methodologies of the synthetic rock mass (SRM) approach and the discrete fracture network (DFN) model to study fracture rock mass behavior. By utilizing field surveys and laboratory experiments, the influence of natural fractures on stone mine pillar mechanics and failure mechanisms is investigated.
The synthetic rock mass (SRM) approach and discrete fracture network (DFN) model, generated from the field surveys, are novel methodologies to study fracture rock mass behavior. In this paper, SRM and DFN methodologies were used to understand the influence of natural fractures on the mechanical response and failure mechanisms of stone mine pillars. First, a multi-stage up-scaling procedure with the homogenization process is established. Later, a stochastic sampling process on the SRM model to have further insight on the stone mine pillar mechanics is performed. Two-dimensional Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC) is utilized to represent intact rock with the Voronoi-Trigon discretized blocks and to capture fractured rock mass behavior. The laboratory-size limestone mine rock specimens are systematically up-scaled to the average width of the field-size stone mine pillars. Then, the DFN model, generated from field data, is sampled to construct the SRM of the field-size pillars. By doing so, the effect of discrete discontinuities on pillar stability is studied by assessing the pillar strengths and failure mechanisms in various width-to-height ratios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available