4.2 Article

Time-segmented Physical Activity Patterns of Brazilian Adolescents: Within- and Between-day Variability

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2022.2102924

Keywords

Motor activity; Accelerometry; adolescent behavior; public health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the within- and between-day variability of sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in adolescents. It found that adolescents were more active before school and after school, with females showing lower MVPA than males during school time, afternoons, and evenings. Additionally, higher age was associated with more sedentary behavior and less LPA during school time, afternoons, and evenings.
This study examined the within- and between-day variability of time-segmented sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in adolescents. The sample comprised 154 adolescents (11-16 years old) from two public schools in Florianopolis, Brazil. The proportion of time spent in SB, LPA, and MVPA was measured using Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers for the following weekday time segments: before school (07:00-07:59), school time (08:00-11:59), after school (12:00-12:59), afternoons (13:00-17:59), and evenings (18:00-23:00). Participants were more active during commuting-related time segments. Females showed lower MVPA than males during school time, afternoons, and evenings, but not before school and after school. Higher age was associated with higher SB and lower LPA during school time, afternoons, and evenings, and slightly lower MVPA during afternoons. The variability of SB, LPA, and MVPA for all time segments was mainly explained by within-participant day-to-day variations rather than between-participant differences of daily-averaged estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available