4.2 Article

ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) tool: adaptation and psychometric properties in South Africa

Journal

GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 375-383

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2022.40

Keywords

Evidence-based psychosocial treatments; South Africa; therapist competencies

Categories

Funding

  1. Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME) - UK Aid from the UK Government
  2. British Medical Research Council
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. DFID [MR/M014290/1]
  5. United States National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH120649]
  6. EQUIP programme
  7. UNICEF
  8. WHO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the systematic adaptation of the ENACT tool for the South African context and presents its initial psychometric properties. The study found that the adapted ENACT-SA tool has good applicability in South Africa and acceptable inter-rater reliability among clinical psychologists and registered counsellors.
Background. The ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) tool measures a set of therapeutic competencies required for the effective psychological intervention, including delivery by non-specialists. This paper describes the systematic adaptation of the ENACT for the South African (SA) context and presents the tool's initial psychometric properties. Methods. We employed a four-step process: (1) Item generation: 204 therapeutic factors were generated by SA psychologists and drawn from the original ENACT as potential items; (2) Item relevance: SA therapists identified 96 items that were thematically coded according to their relationship to one another and were assigned to six domains; (3) Item utility: The ENACT-SA scale was piloted by rating recordings of psychological therapy sessions and stakeholder input; and (4) Psychometric properties: Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the final 12-item ENACT-SA were explored using Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation co-efficient (ICC) for both clinical psychologists and registered counsellors. Results. Although the original ENACT provided a framework for developing a tool for use in SA, several modifications were made to improve the applicability of the tool for the SA context, and optimise its adaptability other contexts. The adapted 12-item tool's internal consistency was good, while the inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both clinical psychologists and registered counsellors. Conclusion. The ENACT-SA is a reliable tool to assess common factors in psychological treatments. It is recommended that the tool be used in conjunction with assessment protocols and treatment-specific competency measures to fully assess implementation fidelity and potential mechanisms of therapeutic change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available