4.4 Article

Comparison of Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Hyphenated to an Ultraviolet Detector and Gas Chromatography Hyphenated to a Flame Ionization Detector for Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Citrus Essential Oils

Journal

SEPARATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/separations9070183

Keywords

green chemistry; supercritical fluid; Citrus; chromatography; terpenes

Funding

  1. BPI France
  2. Region Ile de France
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-16-CE29-0002-01]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE29-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the application of classical gas chromatography (GC) technique and supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) technology for the analysis of lemon essential oil. The results showed that SFC-UV could be considered as an alternative to GC-FID for the characterization and quality control of lemon oil.
A comparison between the classical gas chromatography (GC) technique with supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) technology was performed using an essential oil of Citrus limon (lemon) as a model, considering its wide use in the cosmetic world. For the qualitative part, the signal annotation was achieved by mass spectrometry using either an electron ionization (EI) or an atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) source. For the quantitative part, GC was hyphenated to a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and SFC to an ultraviolet detector (SFC-UV). The assay of the major component of citrus oil, i.e., limonene, was carried out by SFC-UV. The similar results obtained between GC-FID and SFC-UV allows SFC-UV to be considered as an alternative to GC-FID for Citrus oil characterization. Then, analyses of an essential oil collection from Citrus fruits were achieved to confirm the potential use of SFC-UV for oil classification in the context of quality control of raw materials in cosmetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available