4.5 Article

Carbon Nanotube Enhanced Filtration and Dewatering of Kerosene

Journal

MEMBRANES
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes12060621

Keywords

dewatering; filtration; hydrophobic; carbon nanotubes; fuel-water system

Funding

  1. Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems Division, National Science Foundation [CBET-1603314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a carbon nanotube immobilised membrane (CNIM) for filtration and dewatering of kerosene can effectively remove water from the fuel, resulting in a high separation efficiency.
Current approaches to dewatering aviation fuel such as kerosene are adsorption by activated charcoal, gravity separation, etc. The objective of this work is to develop and demonstrate the filtration and dewatering of kerosene using a carbon nanotube immobilised membrane (CNIM). Highly hydrophobic membranes were prepared by immobilising carbon nanotube (CNTs) over polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) microfiltration membrane for the dewatering of ppm level water from kerosene. The effects of different CNT concentrations on membrane morphology, hydrophobicity, porosity, and permeability were characterised. After immobilising CNT into membranes, the contact angle increased by 9%, 16%, and 43% compared to unmodified 0.1 mu m PTFE, 0.22 mu m PTFE and 0.22 mu m PVDF membranes, respectively. The CNIM showed remarkable separation efficiency for the fuel-water system. The micro/nano water droplets coalesced on the CNT surface to form larger diameters of water droplets detached from the membrane surface, leading to enhanced water rejection. In general, the water rejection increased with the amount of CNT immobilised while the effective surface porosity over pore length and flux decreased. PTFE base membrane showed better performance compared to the PVDF substrate. The CNIMs were fabricated with 0.1 and 0.22 mu m PTFE at an optimised CNT loading of 3 and 6 wt.%, and the water rejection was 99.97% and 97.27%, respectively, while the kerosene fluxes were 43.22 kg/m(2)center dot h and 55.44 kg/m(2)center dot h respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available