4.7 Review

Developments of Conventional and Microfluidic Flow Cytometry Enabling High-Throughput Characterization of Single Cells

Journal

BIOSENSORS-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bios12070443

Keywords

single-cell analysis; optoelectronic flow cytometry; hematology analyzer; microfluidic impedance and imaging flow cytometry

Funding

  1. NSFC [61922079, 61825107, 62121003]
  2. CAS [GJJSTD20210004, Y201927]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021Yfb3200804]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-cell analysis plays a crucial role in scientific research and clinical diagnosis, especially in the study of dynamic immune processes and tumor research. The development of optoelectronic flow cytometry technology offers new possibilities for complete blood cell counting and is expected to become the standard for future blood analysis.
This article first reviews scientific meanings of single-cell analysis by highlighting two key scientific problems: landscape reconstruction of cellular identities during dynamic immune processes and mechanisms of tumor origin and evolution. Secondly, the article reviews clinical demands of single-cell analysis, which are complete blood counting enabled by optoelectronic flow cytometry and diagnosis of hematologic malignancies enabled by multicolor fluorescent flow cytometry. Then, this article focuses on the developments of optoelectronic flow cytometry for the complete blood counting by comparing conventional counterparts of hematology analyzers (e.g., DxH 900 of Beckman Coulter, XN-1000 of Sysmex, ADVIA 2120i of Siemens, and CELL-DYN Ruby of Abbott) and microfluidic counterparts (e.g., microfluidic impedance and imaging flow cytometry). Future directions of optoelectronic flow cytometry are indicated where intrinsic rather than dependent biophysical parameters of blood cells must be measured, and they can replace blood smears as the gold standard of blood analysis in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available