4.6 Article

Multi-Objective Safe-Interval Path Planning With Dynamic Obstacles

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 8154-8161

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3187270

Keywords

Motion and path planning

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [2120219, 2120529]
  2. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [2120529] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [2120219] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Path planning among dynamic obstacles is a fundamental problem in Robotics. In this work, we propose an algorithm called MO-SIPP that efficiently solves the problem of Multi-Objective Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles by combining the ideas from SIPP and multi-objective A* algorithms.
Path planning among dynamic obstacles is a fundamental problem in Robotics with numerous applications. In this work, we investigate a problem called Multi-Objective Path Planning with Dynamic Obstacles (MOPPwDO), which requires finding collision-free Pareto-optimal paths amid obstacles moving along known trajectories while simultaneously optimizing multiple conflicting objectives, such as arrival time, communication robustness and obstacle clearance. Most of the existing multi-objective A*-like planners consider no dynamic obstacles, and naively applying them to address MOPPwDO can lead to large computation times. On the other hand, efficient algorithms such as Safe-Interval Path Planing (SIPP) can handle dynamic obstacles but for a single objective. In this work, we develop an algorithm called MO-SIPP by leveraging both the notion of safe intervals from SIPP to efficiently represent the search space in the presence of dynamic obstacles, and search techniques from multi-objective A* algorithms. We show that MO-SIPP is guaranteed to find the entire Pareto-optimal front, and verify MO-SIPP with extensive numerical tests with two and three objectives. The results show that the MO-SIPP runs up to an order of magnitude faster than the conventional alternates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available