4.7 Article

Tumor- associated macrophages correlate with the clinicopathological features and poor outcomes via inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0281-z

Keywords

Tumor-associated macrophages; CD68; CD163; Epithelial to mesenchymal transition; Oral squamous cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272968]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) [2014-37]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Both tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of cancer cells play key roles in promoting tumor progression. However, whether TAMs could induce EMT in the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains undefined. Results: Here we detected the expression of macrophages markers CD68 and CD163, epithelial marker E-cadherin and mesenchymal marker vimentin in 127 OSCC patients by using semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry. CD68 and CD163 expression was not confined to the infiltrating TAMs, but also detected in cancer cells. The high number of CD68-positive macrophages was correlated with poor overall survival. Meanwhile, the expression of CD163 both in macrophages and in cancer cells was associated with poor overall survival and had a significant prognostic impact in OSCC. Importantly, the expression of CD163 in cancer cells had a significant relationship with E-cadherin and vimentin. Furthermore, the incubation of TAMs conditioned medium resulted in a fibroblast-like appearance of cancer cells (HN4, HN6 and SCC9) together with the decreased/increased expression of E-cadherin/vimentin, which were correlated with the enhanced ability of migration and invasion. Conclusions: Our results indicate that TAMs could promote the EMT of cancer cells, thereby leading to the progression of oral cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available