4.6 Article

Genotype-Specific ECG-Based Risk Stratification Approaches in Patients With Long-QT Syndrome

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.916036

Keywords

long-QT syndrome; genetic arrhythmia disorders; risk stratification; QTc; electrocardiogram

Funding

  1. Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung Switzerland
  2. University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital
  3. Bern Center of Precision Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the association of different electrical parameters with the genotype and symptoms in patients with LQTS. The results showed that electrical parameters can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with different genetic forms of LQTS.
BackgroundCongenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is a major cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals, calling for sophisticated risk assessment. Risk stratification, however, is challenging as the individual arrhythmic risk varies pronouncedly, even in individuals carrying the same variant. Materials and MethodsIn this study, we aimed to assess the association of different electrical parameters with the genotype and the symptoms in patients with LQTS. In addition to the heart-rate corrected QT interval (QTc), markers for regional electrical heterogeneity, such as QT dispersion (QT(max)-QT(min) in all ECG leads) and delta T-peak/end (T-peak/end V5 - T-peak/end V2), were assessed in the 12-lead ECG at rest and during exercise testing. ResultsQTc at rest was significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients with LQT2 (493.4 ms +/- 46.5 ms vs. 419.5 ms +/- 28.6 ms, p = 0.004), but surprisingly not associated with symptoms in LQT1. In contrast, post-exercise QTc (minute 4 of recovery) was significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients with LQT1 (486.5 ms +/- 7.0 ms vs. 463.3 ms +/- 16.3 ms, p = 0.04), while no such difference was observed in patients with LQT2. Enhanced delta T-peak/end and QT dispersion were only associated with symptoms in LQT1 (delta T-peak/end 19.0 ms +/- 18.1 ms vs. -4.0 ms +/- 4.4 ms, p = 0.02; QT-dispersion: 54.3 ms +/- 10.2 ms vs. 31.4 ms +/- 10.4 ms, p = 0.01), but not in LQT2. Delta T-peak/end was particularly discriminative after exercise, where all symptomatic patients with LQT1 had positive and all asymptomatic LQT1 patients had negative values (11.8 +/- 7.9 ms vs. -7.5 +/- 1.7 ms, p = 0.003). ConclusionDifferent electrical parameters can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in different genetic forms of LQTS. While the classical QTc at rest was only associated with symptoms in LQT2, post-exercise QTc helped distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with LQT1. Enhanced regional electrical heterogeneity was only associated with symptoms in LQT1, but not in LQT2. Our findings indicate that genotype-specific risk stratification approaches based on electrical parameters could help to optimize risk assessment in LQTS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available