4.7 Review

Biologic Therapies in Pediatric Asthma

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060999

Keywords

asthma; children; biologic agents; monoclonal antibodies; severe asthma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Childhood asthma is a common and complex chronic condition in children, and the management of severe asthma remains challenging. The use of biologic agents has shown promise in treating severe childhood asthma, but long-term effects are still unclear. Further research is needed to determine the most effective biologic agents and predictors of treatment response for pediatric patients.
Undeniably, childhood asthma is a multifactorial and heterogeneous chronic condition widespread in children. Its management, especially of the severe form refractory to standard therapy remains challenging. Over the past decades, the development of biologic agents and their subsequent approval has provided an advanced and very promising treatment alternative, eventually directing toward a successful precision medicine approach. The application of currently approved add-on treatments for severe asthma in children, namely omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab have been shown to be effective in terms of asthma control and exacerbation rate. However, to date, information is still lacking regarding its long-term use. As a result, data are frequently extrapolated from adult studies. Thus, the selection of the appropriate biologic agent, the potential predictors of good asthma response, and the long-term outcome in the pediatric population are still to be further investigated. The aim of the present study was to provide an overview of the current status of the latest evidence about all licensed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that have emerged and been applied to the field of asthma management. The innovative future targets are also briefly discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available