4.7 Article

The Sexual Dimorphism in Cerebrospinal Fluid Protein Content Does Not Affect Intrathecal IgG Synthesis in Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060977

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; cerebrospinal fluid; intrathecal IgG synthesis; blood-cerebrospinal fluid-barrier; sex; age

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of variables affected by sex and age in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome patients was assessed. It was found that sex and age influenced the blood-CSF barrier function and CSF protein content, but had no effect on intrathecal IgG synthesis.
(1) Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that mainly affects young adults and females more than males. The detection of intrathecal IgG synthesis (IIS) on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis supports the diagnosis of MS. A sexual dimorphism has recently been described in CSF protein content. (2) Methods: Clinical and laboratory data from 340 MS patients (F = 231, M = 99) and 89 people with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) (F = 57, M = 32) were retrospectively analyzed to assess the presence of variables affected by sex and age. (3) Results: In MS, the albumin quotient (QA1b), reflecting the blood-CSF barrier (BCSFB) function, was higher in males (5.6 vs. 4.34) and correlated to age with a constant difference between sexes (F = 41.71). In CIS patients, QAlb increased with age only in males (r = 0.3567). Age was positively correlated to disease duration and severity in MS (r = 0.3502, r = 0.2986, respectively). No differences emerged for quantitative and qualitative IIS determinations. (4) Discussion: Although the main difference between males and females concerns the function of BCSFB assessed by QAlb, this sexual dimorphism does not affect the determination of the IIS evaluated both by quantitative and qualitative methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available