4.7 Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Outcome Impact of Cilostazol in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or at a High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060938

Keywords

cilostazol; coronary artery disease; cardiovascular disease

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan [MOHW107TDU-B-211-123003, MOHW108-TDU-B-211-133003]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 106-2811-B-006-060, MOST 107-2314-B-006-076-MY2, MOST 107-2811-B-006-017, MOST 109-2314-B006-069-MY3]
  3. National Cheng Kung University Hospital Research Grant [NCKUH-10203022]
  4. National Cheng Kung University Collaborative Research Grant [NCKUEDA-10714]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cilostazol has beneficial effects on the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease or those at high risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with diabetes or a history of percutaneous coronary intervention.
Previous studies found that cilostazol has a favorable effect on glucose and lipid homeostasis, endothelial function, atherosclerosis, and vasculo-angiogenesis. However, it is poorly understood whether these effects can translate into better clinical outcomes. This study investigated the outcome effect of cilostazol in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or at a high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 266 patients who received cilostazol, 200 mg/day (n = 134) or placebo (n = 132). Pre-specified clinical endpoints including composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarct, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or unplanned coronary revascularization), the composite major coronary event (MCE) and major adverse CV and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), were prospectively assessed. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. Relative to placebo, cilostazol treatment had a borderline effect on risk reduction of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-1.33), whereas the beneficial effect in favor of cilostazol was significant in patients with diabetes mellitus or a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (p for interaction, 0.02 and 0.06, respectively). Use of cilostazol, significantly reduced the risk of MCE (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86) and MACCE (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.96). A significantly lower risk of angina pectoris (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86) was also observed in the cilostazol group. After multi-variable adjustment, cilostazol treatment independently predicted a lower risk of MCE. In conclusion, these results suggest cilostazol may have beneficial effects in patients with CAD or at a high risk of CV disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available