4.7 Review

Role and Function of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Fibroblast in Cutaneous Wound Healing

Journal

BIOMEDICINES
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061391

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cell; wound healing; exosome; regenerative medicine; fibroblast

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skin wounds usually heal on their own, but this is only true for healthy individuals. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been found to play a significant role in wound healing and regeneration, with their ability to self-renew and differentiate, as well as their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. This review aims to explain the functions and effects of MSCs in wound healing.
Skin wounds often repair themselves completely over time; however, this is true only for healthy individuals. Although various studies are being conducted to improve wound-healing therapy outcomes, the mechanisms of wound healing and regeneration are not completely understood yet. In recent years, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been reported to contribute significantly to wound healing and regeneration. Understanding the function of MSCs will help to elucidate the fundamentals of wound healing. MSCs are multipotent stem cells that are used in regenerative medicine for their ability to self-renew and differentiate into bone, fat, and cartilage, with few ethical problems associated with cell harvesting. Additionally, they have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties and antifibrotic effects via paracrine signaling, and many studies have been conducted to use them to treat graft-versus-host disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and intractable cutaneous wounds. Many substances derived from MSCs are involved in the wound-healing process, and specific cascades and pathways have been elucidated. This review aims to explain the fundamental role of MSCs in wound healing and the effects of MSCs on fibroblasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available