4.7 Article

3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced powder-based epoxy composites

Journal

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101239

Keywords

3D printing; Filament fabrication; Continuous carbon fibre reinforced composites; Powder epoxy; Electrostatic powder deposition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an experimental study on 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoset epoxy composites. The study shows that the produced composites have high tensile strength and modulus in the fibre direction due to the good wettability of epoxy and high fibre volume fraction. The study also demonstrates the design freedom of the produced filaments for complex geometries and the improved strength of composites with designed stress-lines fibre paths.
This paper presents an experimental study on 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoset epoxy composites. Powder-based solid epoxy was electrostatically flocked on the 1K continuous carbon fibre tow and then melted to fabricate composite filaments. The produced filament was printed using a modified extrusionbased printer which melted and deposited the filament following designed printing paths, to form multilayer preforms with complex geometries. After vacuum bagging and oven curing, high tensile strength (1372.4 MPa) and modulus (98.2 GPa) were obtained in the fibre direction due to the good wettability of epoxy and the consequent high fibre volume fraction (56%). The tensile tests of open-hole composites were also conducted, in which the sample with designed stress-lines fibre paths was seen to improve the ultimate strength by 95% compared with the mechanically-drilled sample. Other case studies, such as a spanner and a lattice structure, further demonstrated the design freedom of produced filaments for complex geometries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available