Journal
PAIN AND THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 907-922Publisher
SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00394-w
Keywords
Peripheral nerve stimulation; Trigeminal nerve; Occipital nerve; Neurostimulation; Brain stimulation; Neuromodulation; Migraine; Headache
Categories
Funding
- Neurolief Ltd, Netanya, Israel
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel external combined occipital and trigeminal neurostimulation device as a self-administered home treatment for migraine. The results showed that the device was significantly more effective in reducing pain intensity, increasing pain-free ratings, and improving pain relief compared to the sham device.
Introduction: Current external peripheral nerve stimulation devices stimulate only one nerve. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial assessed efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel external combined occipital and trigeminal neurostimulation (eCOT-NS) device as a self-administered home treatment for migraine (Relivion (R) MG, Neurolief Ltd; Netanya, Israel). Methods: Episodic and chronic migraine subjects (N = 55) were randomized to receive active (n = 27) or sham (n = 28) treatment. Subjects received eCOT-NS devices and performed 60 +/- 20-min home treatments within 45 min of migraine episode onset. The primary endpoint was relative (percent) change in mean baseline VAS pain scores 1 h after treatment initiation. Treatment outcomes assessed at 1-, 2-, and 24-h post-treatment initiation were pain reduction and proportion of pain-free subjects and treatment responders, defined as >= 50% pain reduction. Categorical pain ratings (none, mild, moderate, and severe pain) were also analyzed. Results: Active stimulation was significantly more effective than sham stimulation for decreasing pain intensity at 1 h (53% vs. 10%), 2 h (52% vs. 17%), and 24 h (71% vs. 34%). Pain-free ratings were greater for the active treatment arm at 1 h (29.2% vs. 16%), 2 h (41.7% vs. 20%), and 24 h (65.2% vs. 40%). The number of subjects with baseline moderate or severe migraine pain who were pain-free at 2 h was significantly greater among active treatment subjects (43% vs. 10.5%). The responder rate was significantly higher among the active treatment group at 1 h (67% vs. 20%), 2 h (66.7% vs. 32%,), and 24 h (78.3% vs. 48%). Overall headache relief was significantly higher in the active treatment group at 1 h (67% vs. 26%) and 2 h (76% vs. 31.6%). Mild adverse events, reported by a minority of subjects, resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: eCOT-NS provides superior clinically meaningful relief and freedom from migraine pain, offering an effective and safe therapy for acute treatment of migraine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available