4.7 Article

Local Lagrange Exponential Stability Analysis of Quaternion-Valued Neural Networks with Time Delays

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10132157

Keywords

quaternion-valued neural network; local Lagrange exponential stability; multiple equilibrium points; time delay

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62106225]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20F020024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the local stability of quaternion-valued neural networks, which is crucial for the application of associative memory and pattern recognition. The research proposes conditions to ensure the existence of multiple equilibrium points and stable equilibria in quaternion-valued neural networks, improving and extending the existing results.
This study on the local stability of quaternion-valued neural networks is of great significance to the application of associative memory and pattern recognition. In the research, we study local Lagrange exponential stability of quaternion-valued neural networks with time delays. By separating the quaternion-valued neural networks into a real part and three imaginary parts, separating the quaternion field into 3(4n) subregions, and using the intermediate value theorem, sufficient conditions are proposed to ensure quaternion-valued neural networks have 3(4n) equilibrium points. According to the Halanay inequality, the conditions for the existence of 2(4n) local Lagrange exponentially stable equilibria of quaternion-valued neural networks are established. The obtained stability results improve and extend the existing ones. Under the same conditions, quaternion-valued neural networks have more stable equilibrium points than complex-valued neural networks and real-valued neural networks. The validity of the theoretical results were verified by an example.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available