4.7 Article

Decisions for Blockchain Adoption and Information Sharing in a Low Carbon Supply Chain

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 10, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math10132233

Keywords

low-carbon supply chain; blockchain; value-added service; information sharing; game theory

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the adoption of blockchain technology and information sharing in a low-carbon supply chain. The results suggest that supply chain members are more likely to adopt blockchain technology in the absence of sharing or in voluntary sharing scenarios. Mandatory sharing leads to participation in blockchain when the value-added service efficiency exceeds a threshold value.
Enterprises in low-carbon supply chains have been exploring blockchain technology in order to make carbon data transparent. However, there is still some opaque information in the market, such as the value-added service efficiency. How do supply chain members make decisions between information sharing and blockchain adoption? This study considers blockchain adoption and information sharing in a low-carbon supply chain with a single manufacturer and a single retailer. The retailer has private information about value-added services and decides how to share it with the manufacturer. We examine six combined strategies comprised of blockchain scenarios and information sharing formats (no sharing, voluntary sharing, and mandatory sharing). The results indicate that supply chain members prefer blockchain technology under no sharing and voluntary sharing. Under mandatory sharing, supply chain members have incentives to participate in blockchain when the value-added service efficiency exceeds a threshold value. While the manufacturer prefers to obtain the value-added service information, the retailer decides to share information depending on the value-added service efficiency. Besides, supply chain members' attitude toward the sharing contract also depends on the value-added service efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available