4.1 Article

Tetrahymena australis (Protozoa, Ciliophora): A Well-Known But Non-Existing Taxon - Consideration of Its Identification, Definition and Systematic Position

Journal

JOURNAL OF EUKARYOTIC MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 760-770

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeu.12323

Keywords

cox1 gene; cryptic species; SSU rRNA gene; Tetrahymena pyriformis complex

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31401963, 31522051]
  2. Research on Key Techniques of Water Pollution Disposal and Comprehensive Environmental Control under the Sever Anthropogenic Disturbance
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201564022]
  4. Scientific Program of Tianjin City [15YFYBJC00710]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cryptic species of the Tetrahymena pyriformis complex, Tetrahymena australis, has been known for a long time but never properly diagnosed based on taxonomic methods. The species name is thus invalid according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Recently, a population isolated from a freshwater lake in Wuhan, China was investigated using live observations, silver staining methods and gene sequence data. This organism can be separated from other described species of the T. pyriformis complex by its relatively small body size, the number of somatic kineties and differences in sequences of two genes, namely the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1). We compared the SSU rRNA gene sequences of all available Tetrahymena species to reveal the nucleotide differences within this genus. The sequence of the Wuhan population is identical to two sequences of a previously isolated strain of T. australis (ATCC # 30831). Phylogenetic analyses indicate that these three sequences (X56167, M98015, KT334373) cluster with Tetrahymena shanghaiensis (EF070256) in a polytomy. However, sequence divergence of the cox1 gene between the Wuhan population and another strain of T. australis (ATCC # 30271) is 1.4%, suggesting that these may represent different subspecies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available