Journal
ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages 2464-2477Publisher
AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-767
Keywords
Phase I clinical trials; healthy volunteers; screening failure
Categories
Funding
- Cangzhou key RD program [213106025]
- Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [20JCQNJC00190]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study retrospectively analyzed the reasons for screening failure in phase I clinical trials and proposed measures such as strengthening informed consent, improving test sample quality, correcting the definition of no clinical significance, and arranging low-cost and non-invasive examinations to reduce screening costs and protect volunteers.
Background: Phase I clinical trials play an important role in the follow-up clinical trials and even the drug registration and marketing. However, the screening success ratio in phase I clinical trials is low, and the screening process of the trials consumes a significant amount of human and material resources, but the results are unsatisfactory. At present, there is no large sample data analysis for screening failure in phase I clinical trials. It is therefore urgent to find the reasons for screening failure in phase I clinical trials. Methods: A total of 1,058 healthy volunteers who failed the screening in 11 phase I clinical trials were retrospectively collected from October 2018 to June 2021 in Cangzhou Central Hospital. Data on all participants who failed screening for the study were analyzed (descriptive analysis) and reasons for their non-randomization were classified, as well as the differences of main screening failures between four years. Results: A total of 1,466 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the 11 trials, and among them 1,058 subjects failed the screening. The total screening success ratio of our study was only 27.8%, the highest being 38.5% and the lowest being 18.2%. The top 3 reasons for non-randomization were abnormalities in blood biochemistry tests (23.3%), vital sign examination (19.3%), and electrocardiogram (ECG) (16.6%). Abnormal blood biochemistry was the main reason between 2019 and 2021, except for 2018 in which it was the second reason. Conclusions: Screening failure is a burdensome issue which various clinical trial sites must contend with. Investigators can still take some effective measures by strengthening the in-depth understanding of informed consent, paying attention to the quality of test samples, a correcting definition of no clinical significance (NCS). Also, low-cost and non-invasive examinations can be arranged first to better protect the volunteers and reduce the screening costs of clinical trials. To our delight, we find people's attention to the annual physical examination may help to screen healthy volunteers. Overall, this study shows that it is crucial and professional to develop a screening plan to minimize the resultant impact on timelines and budgets of phase I clinical trials enrolling healthy volunteers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available