4.7 Article

Aerodynamic Load Prediction on a Patrol Vessel Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10070935

Keywords

aerodynamic loads; CFD; OpenFOAM; scale-effect; patrol vessel; turbulence model dependency

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund (Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional-FEDER)
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia-FCT) [02/SAICT/032037/2017]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia-FCT) [UIDB/UIDP/00134/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the aerodynamic loads on a naval patrol vessel using computational fluid dynamic simulations. The results provide reliable aerodynamic load data for developing reliable manoeuvring models, which is crucial for high-speed vessels with sophisticated superstructures.
Aerodynamic loads and moments on a naval patrol vessel are investigated using computational fluid dynamic simulations based on the OpenFOAM solver. After the initial turbulence, time, and grid dependency study, model scale simulations were performed for a wide range of inflow angles to predict aerodynamic forces and moments acting on the vessel at different heading conditions. For validation, model scale results were compared with wind tunnel data for similar hull forms. Finally, full-scale simulations were performed for a few cases to investigate possible scale effects on simulation results. The revealed scale effect turned out significant only for the yaw moment response. In this study, we aimed to produce reliable aerodynamic load data for the high-speed vessel, which is essential to developing reliable manoeuvring models. We conclude that Computational Fluid Dynamics is capable of providing reliable aerodynamic load predictions for high-speed vessels with sophisticated superstructures, in an economical manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available