4.4 Article

Nash bargaining in a general equilibrium framework: The case of a shared surface water supply

Journal

WATER RESOURCES AND ECONOMICS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wre.2022.100206

Keywords

Nash bargaining solution; Optimal water-sharing agreement; Water trading

Funding

  1. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station [UTA0-1646]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the axiomatic Nash bargaining approach is applied to evaluate its normative implications in the context of interregional water sharing. The findings suggest that the Nash bargaining solution is generally unfeasible for sharing surplus water supplies generated by a water development project, except for specific conditions.
We extend the axiomatic Nash bargaining approach to the context of interregional water sharing in order to assess the approach's normative implications in a general equilibrium (GE) framework. The GE model is applied to a water development project proposed for the Wasatch Front and Cache Valley regions of Utah - the Bear River Development Project (BRDP). We demonstrate conceptually how an allocation rule and attendant net regional welfare measures are endogenously determined as equilibrium solutions to the bargaining problem. Numerical analysis, based upon a simulation model calibrated to current data, reveals that Nash bargaining is generally infeasible as a solution mechanism for sharing surplus water supplies generated through the implementation of the BRDP, with or without potential ex post side-payments made between Cache Valley and the Wasatch Front. Only in the special case of (1) larger future regional population sizes, (2) a hypothetical, joint per-capita cost-share arrangement where total project (i.e. fixed) costs are shared equally across the two regions, (3) hypothetically larger water augmentation rates, and (4) the ignoring of potential environmental costs, is the Nash bargaining solution viable. Otherwise, for all other scenarios where the analysis is based upon current or future population sizes, joint-or region-specific cost-share arrangements, lower or higher water augmentation rates, and internalized or externalized environmental costs, the Nash bargaining solution is found to be unattainable as a potential mechanism to share surplus water supplies produced by the BRDP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available