4.7 Article

Critical modelling criteria for precast pre-stressed hollow-core slabs

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104545

Keywords

Finite element analysis; Hollow core slab; Shear strength; Prestressed concrete; Precast members; Fracture mechanics

Funding

  1. RANZ-funded ReCast Project via the University of Auckland
  2. QuakeCoRE
  3. New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed nonlinear finite element model is proposed to accurately predict the shear failure mechanism and shear capacity of precast pre-stressed hollow-core (PPHC) slabs under vertical loading. The sensitivity study reveals that the modulus of rupture and crack bandwidth of the concrete, as well as the cross-sectional size of the solid mesh element, are the most important variables to consider in reliability studies.
A detailed nonlinear finite element (FE) modelling approach is proposed to represent the behavior of precast pre-stressed hollow-core (PPHC) slabs under vertical loading until shear failure. Comparisons of the numerical predictions with experimental results show that the proposed model is capable of capturing the shear failure mechanism and related shear capacity of PPHC slabs with different shear spans. In addition, a detailed sensitivity study is conducted to determine the relative significance of each parameter in the strength and deformation capacity predictions made using the developed FE model of PPHC slabs. It is observed that the modulus of rupture and the crack bandwidth of the concrete and the cross-sectional size of the solid mesh element are the most important variables to be considered in reliability studies. In particular, for shorter shear spans, the modulus of rupture of the concrete played a dominant role in estimating the strength and deformation capacity of the PPHC slabs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available