4.7 Article

A novel study to examine dependency of indoor temperature and PCM to reduce energy consumption in buildings

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104249

Keywords

PCM; Building; Cooling; Energy; Setpoint

Funding

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP2022R515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on using SP21-EK to reduce the share of buildings in energy usage in Saudi Arabia, revealing significant energy savings in controlling internal temperatures.
In our world, primary energy per capita in 2020 was 71.4 units while in many countries such as Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) this figure is very high (303.3 units). While more than 50% of electricity in Saudi Arabia is used in buildings, in this study, SP21-EK was utilized to fall the share of buildings in energy usage. In this numerical study, energy equations with momentum were developed. In addition, radiation was applied to the entire building through boundary conditions. Although in many studies, the outside temperature has been known as an influential parameter on the choice of PCM, in this study, the focus is on the internal temperature of the building and its effects. The indoor temperature depends on the air conditioning system settings and can be set as a single setpoint or interval one. For the first case, setpoints of 21-26 & DEG;C were defined and it was observed that at best setpoint (22 & DEG;C) the presence of SP-21EK dropped energy demand by 43.2%, while for 26 & DEG;C, this value was 20%. The effect of PCM was investigated in scenarios of 21-23 & DEG;C, 21-24 & DEG;C, 21-25 & DEG;C and 21-26 & DEG;C. Energy saving owing to using SP21-EK was 20341, 18164, 15131 and 13160 kWh. It was found that the scenario of 21 -23 & DEG;C that corresponds to the PCM phase transition (21-23 & DEG;C) had the most positive results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available