4.6 Review

Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071751

Keywords

bicuspid aortic valve; children; diagnostic imaging; echocardiography; natural history

Ask authors/readers for more resources

"Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect, with a prevalence of 0.8% in the general pediatric population. It is often associated with aortic coarctation and has a genetic basis. While complications are rare in children, severe BAV dysfunction may require surgery. The optimal treatment approach for severe aortic stenosis in children and adolescents is not well-defined, but percutaneous intervention can be considered as a palliative option."
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect. Prevalence of isolated BAV in the general pediatric population is about 0.8%, but it has been reported to be as high as 85% in patients with aortic coarctation. A genetic basis has been recognized, with great heterogeneity. Standard BAV terminology, recently proposed on the basis of morpho-functional assessment by transthoracic echocardiography, may be applied also to the pediatric population. Apart from neonatal stenotic BAV, progression of valve dysfunction and/or of the associated aortic dilation seems to be slow during pediatric age and complications are reported to be much rarer in comparison with adults. When required, because of severe BAV dysfunction, surgery is most often the therapeutic choice; however, the ideal initial approach to treat severe aortic stenosis in children or adolescents is not completely defined yet, and a percutaneous approach may be considered in selected cases as a palliative option in order to postpone surgery. A comprehensive and tailored evaluation is needed to define the right intervals for cardiologic evaluation, indications for sport activity and the right timing for intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available