4.6 Review

NT-proBNP Concentrations in the Umbilical Cord and Serum of Term Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061416

Keywords

biomarker; neonate; Nt-proBnp; serum; umbilical cord

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study detected and analyzed the levels of NT-proBNP in umbilical cord blood samples and serum samples from healthy term neonates during the neonatal period. The results showed that the concentration of NT-proBNP was higher in the serum samples compared to the umbilical cord blood samples. Furthermore, the potential effect of perinatal factors on the reference range of this biomarker needs to be further investigated.
The detection of NT-proBNP levels both in umbilical cord blood (UCB) samples and in serum samples collected from healthy term neonates during the neonatal period. A systematic review of relevant literature in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was conducted. For quality appraisal, the potential risk of bias was assessed using the BIOCROSS evaluation tool. The random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to calculate weighted mean differences with a corresponding 95% confidence interval. A total of forty (40) studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. After further examination, eighteen (18) studies (1738 participants) from the UCB sample group and fourteen (14) studies (393 participants) from the serum sample group were selected to perform a metaanalysis. Using the fixed-effects model, the mean intervals of NT-proBNP in UCB and serum samples were 492 pg/mL (95% CI: 480-503 pg/mL) and 1341 pg/mL (95% CI: 1286-1397 pg/mL), respectively. A higher concentration of NT-proBNP was observed in the serum sample group compared to the UCB samples (p < 0.001). We present the intervals of NT-proBNP in UCB and in the serum of healthy term neonates. The determination of the potential effect of perinatal factors on the biomarker's reference range was also aimed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available