4.6 Article

Consumption and Preferences for Wild and Domestic Meat in Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.900398

Keywords

wildlife; game; fish; domestic protein; diet; ethnozoology; nutrition; protect area

Categories

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [422041/2018-1]
  3. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, wild animals have been the main source of protein for indigenous populations worldwide. However, due to market access and policies promoting agricultural development, people have shifted towards domestic sources of protein. In this study, we found that the Potiguara population on the Brazilian coast preferred and consumed domestic meats over wild animals, despite the abundant availability of fish and crustaceans. Male students showed higher consumption and preference for game animals, while female students had higher avoidance. Occupation, distance between villages, and access to different types of meat influenced their food habits.
Wild animals have traditionally been the main sources of protein available, if not the only, to numerous indigenous populations worldwide. However, greater access to markets, reduced availability or access to wildlife, and policies in support of agricultural development, have shifted food habits toward domestic and industrial sources of protein. In this study, we evaluated consumption patterns and preferences/avoidances for wild animals (wildmeat, crustaceans, and fish) in comparison to domestic sources of protein among the Potiguara living on the Brazilian coast. Using data from 843 semi-structured interviews applied to students from 28 indigenous villages, we found that domestic meats were more consumed and preferred as compared to wild animals (aquatic and game animals), despite the high abundance of fish and crustacean resources in the surveyed area. Consumption and preference for game were higher among male students while avoidance was higher among female students. The avoidance of domestic meats and fish was low for both genders. The occupation of the fathers affected students' food habits, in those nature-related occupations (farmer, fisherman/woman, sugarcane worker) conditioned greater consumption of wildmeat and fish, while non-nature related occupations lead to greater consumption of protein from domestic sources. The consumption of protein from all sources increased with the distance between villages and a protected area. Our results indicate that the younger generation of Potiguaras does not regularly consume wildmeat and fish and their preference for domestic sources of protein is shaped by the socio-environmental context, access to different types of meat, and taste preferences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available