4.6 Article

New Genus and Species of Empheriidae (Insecta: Psocodea: Trogiomorpha) and Their Implication for the Phylogeny of Infraorder Atropetae

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.907903

Keywords

Archaeatropidae; new taxon; phylogeny; synonymy; Trogiomorpha; psocoptera

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970436, 31730087, 32101239, 32020103006]
  2. Joint Fund of the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation
  3. Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KZ201810028046]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19H03278]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H03278] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new species of psocids from Mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber are described and assigned to the family Empheriidae. A phylogenetic analysis reveals the close relationship between the fossil families Empheriidae and Archaeatropidae.
Two species of psocids discovered from the Mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, Latempheria kachinensis Li, Yoshizawa, and Yao, gen. et sp. nov. and Burmempheria curvatavena Li, Yoshizawa, and Yao, sp. nov., are described and assigned to the Empheriidae (Trogiomorpha: Atropetae) family. A phylogenetic analysis of the infraorder Atropetae is conducted based on 38 morphological characters of three outgroups and fifteen ingroups, which supported the monophyly of Atropetae including fossil and extant taxa. In the phylogenetic result, all the genera of fossil families Empheriidae and Archaeatropidae form a monophyletic group, sister to the extant members of Atropetae. The two fossil families also share a lot of similarities in morphology, locality, and geological period. Recently discovered fossil species exhibited combined morphological characters of both families. Based on these observations and the results of the phylogenetic analysis, Archaeatropidae is treated here as a new junior synonym of Empheriidae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available