4.5 Review

Effects of Long-Term Exposure to High Altitude Hypoxia on Cognitive Function and Its Mechanism: A Narrative Review

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060808

Keywords

high altitude; long-term exposure; lowlanders; cognitive function; mechanism

Categories

Funding

  1. NationalNatural Science Foundation of China [31771247, 31100810]
  2. High-level Talents Training Program for postgraduates of Tibet University [2020-GSP-S152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-term exposure to low oxygen in high-altitude environments affects the cognitive function of lowlanders, which is of significant scientific and social importance for plateau economic development and human wellbeing.
Cognitive function is affected by low pressure and hypoxia in high-altitude environments, and is regulated by altitude and exposure time. With the economic development in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the increase in work and study activities, as well as the development of plateau tourism, mountaineering, and other activities, the number of plateau immigrants is increasing daily. Long-term hypoxia challenges human physical and mental health, restricts work efficiency, and thus affects plateau economic development and human wellbeing. Therefore, it is of scientific and social significance to study how long-term exposure to the hypoxic plateau environment affects the physical and mental health of lowlanders as part of the ongoing development of the current plateau region. In this paper, we reviewed the research progress and mechanism of the effects of long-term (>= 1 year) high-altitude (>2500 m) hypoxia exposure on the cognitive function of lowlanders, and suggested that the scope and sample size of the research should be expanded in the future, and that follow-up studies should be carried out to explore the time threshold of cognitive impairment and its compensatory or repair mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available