4.5 Article

A Novel Deep Learning Radiomics Model to Discriminate AD, MCI and NC: An Exploratory Study Based on Tau PET Scans from ADNI

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12081067

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; mild cognitive impairment; tau positron emission tomography; deep learning radiomics

Categories

Funding

  1. Open Project Program of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province [HYX21004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a novel model based on deep learning radiomics to differentiate Alzheimer's disease patients, mild cognitive impairment patients, and normal control subjects. The model achieved the best classification performance compared to traditional models, and showed potential clinical value in discriminating AD, MCI, and NC.
Objective: We explored a novel model based on deep learning radiomics (DLR) to differentiate Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients and normal control (NC) subjects. This model was validated in an exploratory study using tau positron emission tomography (tau-PET) scans. Methods: In this study, we selected tau-PET scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database (ADNI), which included a total of 211 NC, 197 MCI, and 117 AD subjects. The dataset was divided into one training/validation group and one separate external group for testing. The proposed DLR model contained the following three steps: (1) pre-training of candidate deep learning models; (2) extraction and selection of DLR features; (3) classification based on support vector machine (SVM). In the comparative experiments, we compared the DLR model with three traditional models, including the SUVR model, traditional radiomics model, and a clinical model. Ten-fold cross-validation was carried out 200 times in the experiments. Results: Compared with other models, the DLR model achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 90.76% +/- 2.15% in NC vs. MCI, 88.43% +/- 2.32% in MCI vs. AD, and 99.92% +/- 0.51% in NC vs. AD. Conclusions: Our proposed DLR model had the potential clinical value to discriminate AD, MCI and NC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available