4.5 Article

Capturing Subjective Mild Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060741

Keywords

assessment; activities of daily living; functional cognition; Parkinson's disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Israeli Ministry of Science and Technology [3-13719]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to capture subjective daily functional cognitive decline among patients with Parkinson's disease. Significant between-group differences were found in the Daily Living Questionnaire (DLQ) and Time Organisation and Participation Scale (TOPS) scores. There were also significant correlations among the questionnaire results, with specific items accounting for 35% of the variance in the cognitive functional feature.
This study aimed to capture subjective daily functional cognitive decline among patients with Parkinson's disease. Participants (40-79 y; 78 with Parkinson's disease and 41 healthy matched controls) completed the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (CFRS), Daily Living Questionnaire (DLQ), and Time Organisation and Participation Scale (TOPS) questionnaires. Patients with Parkinson's disease were divided into groups with or without suspected mild cognitive decline according to their scores on the Cognitive Functional (CF) feature, which is based on certain items of the MDS-UPDRS. Significant between-group differences were found in the DLQ and TOPS scores. Significant correlations were found among the questionnaire results, with specific DLQ and TOPS items accounting for 35% of the variance in the CF feature, which correlated with daily cognitive functional states. This study's results are relevant for detecting subtle deficits in Parkinson's disease patients suspected of mild cognitive decline, which can affect health and quality of life and relates to risk for later dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available